Does carbon dating proved evolution
Most people, even the experts in the field, forget the assumptions on which radiometric dating is based.
Radioactive Dating There are basically two different kinds of radioactive dating methods.
"How can creationists expect people to accept a young earth when science has proved through radiometric dating that the earth is billions of years old?
Because mammal bones had been found below this stratum, they said these dates were obviously in error because of "the possible presence of extraneous argon derived from inclusions of pre-existing rocks." Even though the rock looked good, anything older than 5 MY was obviously wrong in view of their knowledge of the "sequence of evolutionary development." Meanwhile a team from the University of California at Berkeley, led by G. Curtis, analyzed several KBS pumice rocks and found some that were around 1.6 MY and some that were about 1.8 MY.Other measurements, some as low as 0.5 MY, were said to be anomalously young.These were explained as possible overprinting by an alkaline-rich hot water infusion.One is the Carbon-14 system used for dating fragments of once-living organisms.It's never used for non-organic samples, and almost never even attempted if the sample is thought to be much older than about 50,000 years.
It is well known that argon, which is a gas, diffuses easily through rock, and there is no way of knowing whether that may have happened in any given case.